Formal Verification Boundary
This page clarifies the public boundary between independent research identity, reproducible artifact practice, Lean/formal-verification work, SHA-256 ledger policy, and external physics-formalization projects.
ORCID: 0009-0008-8459-3400
Formal verification / Lean 4 / reproducible proof artifacts.
STATUS := PUBLIC_BOUNDARY_PAGE
This page records scope, admissible claims, and explicit non-affiliation boundaries.
URF and reproducible evidence artifacts
URF evidence packets are treated as frozen, reproducible artifacts. A claim is not promoted beyond its verified boundary unless the supporting text, code, artifact hashes, verifier outputs, and assumptions are available from public inputs.
Lean / verification repositories
Lean 4 and related verification repositories are used as machine-checkable proof and boundary infrastructure where applicable. A compiled Lean theorem certifies only the theorem actually stated in the source, under the imports and assumptions visible to the checker.
SHA-256 ledger policy
SHA-256 hashes identify frozen public artifacts and support reproducibility checks. A hash certifies artifact identity, not mathematical truth by itself. Mathematical or scientific claims still require explicit proof objects, verifier outputs, or clearly stated assumptions.
HepLean / PhysLean boundary
HepLean and PhysLean are independent Lean formalization efforts for physics. This page may compare methods with those projects, but it does not claim affiliation, contribution, endorsement, or integration unless an actual public citation, issue, pull request, or committed contribution exists.
- HepLean reference: arXiv:2405.08863
- Lean 4 physics index notation reference: arXiv:2411.07667
Mainstream-impact boundary
The admissible external-status statement is:
no public evidence found of mainstream adoption or accepted breakthrough impact.
Stronger claims such as zero impact are not used here because they require exhaustive
negative evidence.
Major open-problem boundary
P vs NP, Clay Millennium problems, and similarly open problems remain BOUNDARY unless
the Lean source proves the actual standard theorem without hidden assumptions, axiom,
opaque, sorry, or admit.
BOUNDARY := no HepLean or PhysLean affiliation is claimed here.